Audited ST’s

> Heidrun Beer writes:
> >
> >I have given my first sessions of audited NOTs. I wanted to become
> >an auditor for 20 years - the manager beingness I developed as a
> >danger bypass because I saw that management didn't function -,
> >and I'm having the time of my life!
> >
> -----snip-------**
Robert Ducharme wrote:
>
> As much as I think it commendable to take up processing, I think the minimal
> amount of NOTs should be done. Maybe an hour or two at most should be done,
> and just to get the person to be able to run it solo on himself. Others
> would differ vehemently with that. Of course that is just an opinion and
> not based on any testing on what the ideal amount of NOTs auditing might be.

Vehementlty? No! But process the pc in front of you.

Most of you know my position regarding NOT's. Labelling any entity a BT is degrading and
a negative process. Even the most dense people can conceive of spiritual helpers, that
we are a composite of billions of Spiritual Teammates is a big educating, hatting,
training and processing feat, unto itself.
>
> The reason I give is that a lot of items are skimmed away from the surface
> by running NOTs. If each of these items were taken up individually and run
> back to its basic, the most incredible case gain and ability recovery would
> be had by the processee. This is not possible with NOTs. NOTs gets the
> person to be able to key out the trauma bank on an ongoing basis by
> "releasing BTs" from the areas of charge. It's like pulling weeds by
> clipping them at the ground's surface. They're still there in one form or
> another.

Maybe yes, maybe no. Only the bad processors would process the wrong case. Basic
is basic.

BTW the biggest problem with new or poor processors is they often process the
wrong pc, they start a chain on one pc, make a flub and end up processing another
ST instead. This can really by-passs a lot of charge, as the pc who was in-charge
is now fighting the newly appointed (by the flubby processor) leader.
>
> I know that a lot of people believe running track should not be done for
> various reason. Those people only need to try it once the CORRECT way and
> they will immediately see the fallicy of that belief.

I haven't been able to find any way of not running what is there. Though I do
believe it can be run too long.
>
> NOTs is a valid tech, but we should remember that it was an unusual solution
> to a tech which was grossly misapplied in the first place.

Entity tech has been around since '51. It is not an unusual solution. As there
are huge quantities of ST's, then it is vital they all recieve the same level of
training and processing as you do. But as you are the senior in-charge, it is up
to you to see your ST's are well trained, well hatted and well processed.

There is an incredible sense of power and purpose when a few million of your ST's
commence a massive co=process and co-training. The sense of power and stability is
awesome.

> When track running is done properly, misownership of pictures is not an
> issue. Beings may not have their own reactive minds, but they do have their
> own time tracks and their own trauma banks. These need to be addressed
> fully and not just dismissed away with a couple of commands.

Ah! With this I can totally agree with!!! Yeah! (:-o)
>
> If I thought NOTs was important to my clients I would most certainly be
> auditing them on it and training them in doing it. I don't.

Tsk, tsk, you blew it with that one. Boo! Hiss! You should not be deciding for your
clients, like that. That's a gross evaluation.

That's processing your case onto the client. You must process what is there. Not what
you think is important or not.

> Not because of
> legalities or financial reasons, but because I know that the proper and
> thorough method of handling items will result in the maximum amount of case
> gain.

Justification!
>
> I think that erasure of pain and restimulation is a very limited goal for
> processing. That's about the only thing NOTs is useful for.

Now you've shown you level of unreality on the area.

 
There is a simple law as regards ST's:

"How you handle and appreciate your ST's, is how you handle and appreciate people."

> Processing
> should be for the advancement and expansion of the being. Through
> processing, the being should be able to 1. literally expand as a spiritual
> being in terms of ability and space, 2. learn more about himself and about
> life and the mechanisms thereof, and 3. release pain - in that order of
> priority.

That is great, but your ST's ARE part of the composite you. So the above applies
to each of them as well.
>
> NOTs accomplishes number 3 - sometimes, and robs the client of visible items
> that could be used for tremendous case gain.

Crap. Lousy, pretentious processors and glib staffs who constantly tacitly sabotage
their own ST's would bring that about.

The reverse is true. If your ST's are well hatted. trained and processed they will
help you process out huge areas of charge and case.

These days I usually pull up the area of charge, handle what I need to confront
and give the rest to my ST's to process out. It is possible to have several areas
being handled at once. A multi-tasking ST processing, hatting and education factory.

Powerful, well trained ST's are very empowering. As most of my ST's have had as much
training and processing as me, plus as my staff at the center also hat, train and
process their ST's well, a formidable psychic team is coming into being.

OT doesn't just mean for you alone, it also includes co-acting and co-creating with
others. An OT soon gets processed back downscale if surrounded by unhatted, untrained,
over-restimulated associates. The clear goes unclear in the same circumstances.

The major reason I want Beings to become masterful processors is so their ST's also
become masterful processors. When you get trained so do ALL your ST's. They can then
co-process each other. That will make stable OT's.

The rest is just pretense.